Please welcome this guest post and giveaway from Regina Jeffers!
What hope was there for the dowerless daughters of the middle class during Jane Austen’s lifetime? Such is a topic Austen explored repeatedly in her novels. Elizabeth and Jane Bennet sought men of a like mind. The Dashwood sisters found their choices limited by their financial situation. Fanny Harville and Captain Benwick could not marry until he earned his future. General Tilney drove Catherine Morland from his home because of the lady’s lack of funds. Charlotte Lucas accepted Mr. Collins as her last opportunity for a respectable match. The intricacies and tedium of high society, particularly of partner selection, and the conflicts of marriage for love and marriage for property are repeated themes.
Marriage provided women with financial security. Henry Tilney of Northanger Abbey explains, “… in both [marriage and a country dance], man has the advantage of choice, woman only the power of refusal: that in both, it is an engagement between man and woman, formed for the advantage of each.”
Women of Austen’s gentry class had no legal identity. No matter how clever the woman might be, finding a husband was the only option for a future beyond the tedium of spinsterhood. A woman could not buy property or write a will without her husband’s approval. If a woman was fortunate, she would bring to her marriage a settlement–money secured for her when she came of age–usually an inheritance from her mother. The oldest son or male heir received the family estate, and the unmarried or widowed females lived on his kindness. Such would be the fate of Mrs. Bennet and her daughters if Mr. Bennet died from a fall from his horse or any other maladies not treatable by Regency medical procedures.
The ladies of Sense and Sensibility have the reality of “poor relatives” thrust upon them when Henry Dashwood leaves Norland to his son, John, by a previous marriage, thus keeping Norland in the Dashwood family. However, the four Dashwood ladies suddenly find themselves unwelcome guests in their own home and removing to a modest cottage with an income of £500 annually. As such, they have no occasion for visits to London unless someone else assumes the expenses. Their social circle shrinks, and the opportunities to meet eligible suitors becomes nearly non-existent. With dowries of £1000 each, the Dashwood sisters are not likely to attract a man who will improve their lots.
Jane Austen, herself, lived quite modestly. The Austens lived frugally among the country gentry. The Austen sisters were well-educated by the standards of the day, but without chances for dowries, Jane and Cassandra possessed limited prospects. Jane met a Mr. Blackall the year Cassandra lost her Mr. Fowle. In a letter, Blackall expressed to Mrs. Lefroy a desire to know Jane better; yet, he confided, “But at present I cannot indulge any expectation of it.” To which, Jane Austen responded, “This is rational enough. There is less love and more sense in it than sometimes appeared before, and I am very well satisfied.” Imperfect opportunities were Jane Austen’s reality. In 1802, Jane Austen accepted an offer of marriage from Harris Bigg. With this marriage, Jane would have become the mistress of Manydown.
Yet, despite her affection for the Biggs-Wither family, Austen could not deceive Bigg. The following morning, she refused the man’s proposal. Whether she thought to someday find another or whether Austen accepted the fact that her refusal doomed her to a life as a spinster, we shall never know. In the “limited” world in which Jane Austen lived, she could not have known her eventual influence on the literary canon.
Austen held personal knowledge of young women seeking husbands in one of the British colonies. Reverend Austen’s sister, Philadelphia, traveled to India in 1752, where she married an English surgeon Tysoe Hancock, a man twenty years her senior. When the Hancocks returned to England a decade later, Reverend Austen traveled to London to greet his sister. However, Philadelphia and Tysoe were not to live “happily ever after.” Unable to support his family in proper English style, Tysoe returned to India to make his living. He never saw his wife and child again. Despite its tragic ending, this “marriage” secured Philadelphia’s future and the lady’s place in society. Only marriage could offer a woman respectability.
In Jane Austen for Dummies (page 134), Joan Klingel Ray breaks down the financial prospects of the Dashwood sisters. Converting the £500 to a modern equivalent, Ray comes out with a figure of $46,875. For the gentry, supporting four women, two maids, a man-servant, paying rent, buying clothes, food, coal, etc., that sum would have meant a poor existence. I find in reading Sense and Sensibility that I am often disappointed with the eventual choices of the Dashwood sisters. Edward Ferras and Colonel Brandon possess little of the “glitz and the glamour” that my innate Cinderella syndrome requires in a love match. However, if any affection did exist between the couples, then Marianne and Elinor, under the circumstances and the times, made brilliant matches. They settled for the “compromise” marriage common in the Regency era.
Three lucky participants will each win one copy of a Regina Jeffers e-book (see below)! All you have to do to be considered is 1) be a pre-registered participant of Roof Beam Reader’s Austen in August event and 2) leave a comment on this post telling us which e-book you’d most like to win! Note: This giveaway is open until 10pm CST on August 26th.
1. The Prosecution of Mr. Darcy’s Cousin: A Pride and Prejudice Mystery
2. Elizabeth Bennet’s Deception: A Pride and Prejudice Vagary
3. Mr. Darcy’s Fault: A Pride and Prejudice Vagary Novella
About the Author:
Regina Jeffers is an award-winning author of cozy mysteries, Austenesque sequels and retellings, and Regency era romances. A teacher for thirty-nine years, Jeffers often serves as a consultant for Language Arts and Media Literacy programs. With 6 new releases coming out in 2015, Jeffers is considered one of publishing’s most prolific authors.
Thanks, Regina, and good luck to all entrants!
I love this post’s focus on the history! As much as I loved the feminist bent of Pride and Prejudice, it is important to keep in mind how powerless women of the time were if they didn’t marry.
No giveaway for me, didn’t register in time. 🙂
I appreciate your comment, Shaina. For an author of historical fiction it is a careful balance in keeping the history correct and balancing it with the romance.
What an interesting article on the place of women in Regency society. Ii just finished reading Jane Austen Among Women which poised the question of did Jane refuse the Biggs marrage proposal because as a wife she would have had many responsibilites severely cutting inot her writing time…
thanks for the giveaway!
It is difficult to chose among the 3 but I think Mr Darcy’s Fault is my 1st choice.
Good day, Theresa. I strongly suspect that Jane Austen chose to remain with her mother and sister because that would be what was expected of her at the time. Perhaps, Austen’s desire to write of women choosing romance played out in her real life. Would it not be wonderful to ask her that very question?
I agree it would be marvelous to sit and talk wth her….since we cant do that I have been trying to read her biographies and academic books about her works as my Austen in August personal project….alas the month is too short and there is so much I want to read!
Hi Theresa – you’re a winner! Can you let us know what your email address is so we can contact you?
I am so behind on all of this goodness – I missed the Austin event , sounds wonderful though!
I fear I am a bit behind, too, Sheila. Life sometimes interrupts the “good things” coming our way. I appreciate you joined us today.
What a great prize! I’ve been loving Austen in August this year.
I would love Mr. Darcy’s fault.
“Lost in Literature” is the story of my life. I am never happier than when I am sitting on the floor at the library and surrounded by books. I wish you well in the giveaway.
I am glad when I was young and dating that I wasn’t in the same category as women back in Regency England times. Somehow back then not of the Ton weren’t able to wed because of lack of a dowery. However, second, third and fourth sons had to work in a specialized field to get money to marry. I so like today’s ideas much better. However, there are still people in today’s society that live like they did in Regency Times.
This was very interesting article and I thank you for reviewing of what I already knew.
I have read all three of the novels and loved them especially, “The Persecution of Mr. Darcy’s Cousin.”
Do not enter me in this free giveaway.
The upper class married to maintain blood lines, while the middle classes were more inclined to marry for love. Perhaps, you and I might have found some happiness, MaryAnn. Although as a former teacher, the prospects were quite dismal.
Alas, I too am addicted to happy endings, so I am very sad that Dr Hancock died alone in India, far from his wife and beloved daughter. And then Eliza’s French husband was guillotined – alors! Add in the death of Cassandra’s fiancee, and Jane’s unhappy nieces May, Lou, and Cass who died in Ireland… well, you have a very sad family history. No wonder Jane escaped to her writing for relief.
You are well versed in the Austen family history, June. I forgot about her nieces.
Her nieces could be a separate post for you, Regina. But their lives were so overwhelmingly sad! I could slap their brothers for how they treated their sisters. Had Jane Austen lived to see it, I hope she would have lectured them severely — a Lizzy Bennet response, not a Fanny Price.
All of the books sound fabulous.
I would choose Elizabeth Bennet’s Deception: A Pride and Prejudice Vagary thank you.
Good day, Mary. I am glad you joined us today.
Hi Mary, you’re a winner! Can you respond with your email address so we can contact you?
Having to choose one, I would opt for Elizabeth Bennet’s Deception. The cover is GORGEOUS!
When I saw the image for EBD, I fell in love with the cover. I have another beautiful cover for an upcoming book called ” Elizabeth Bennet’s Excellent Adventure.” The image for Mr. Darcy’s Fault reminded me of Matthew Macfadyen entrance into the Meryton assembly in P&P 2005. It was really a man looking out over a blue big city skyline. Images are layered, and I could lift the man’s shadow from the original. And the man on “Prosecution” is absolutely yummy! LOL!
Terrific historical guest post. It always really bothers me how women had so few choices back then.
Please enter me for The Prosecution of Mr. Darcy’s Cousin. Thank you!
Pingback: Austen in August – Roundup | Girl with her Head in a Book