Guest Post & Giveaway: Among the Janeites! (#AustenInAugustRBR)

JASNAbanner.

Last fall, the Jane Austen Society of North America staged its annual conference, a yearly blend of the high and the low, the seriously academic and the gleefully pop. As I strolled past the tables of hopeful authors assembled for a mass book-signing, one accidental pairing seemed to encapsulate everything I’d learned about Janeites while researching and writing Among the Janeites: A Journey Through the World of Jane Austen Fandom.  Sharing a table were Lori Smith, a devout Christian whose memoir, A Walk with Jane Austen, explores how her own commitment to premarital chastity resonates with Austen’s lifelong virginity; and Linda Berdoll, the author of three bodice-ripping Pride and Prejudice sequels featuring explicit descriptions of Elizabeth and Darcy’s energetic sex life.

It’s tough to pigeonhole Jane Austen enthusiasts.  For my book, a non-fiction report from the trenches of fandom, I interviewed – among others – a Texan with a closetful of Regency gowns, a speech pathologist who believes Austen wrote about autism, and an English professor whose roller derby nom de skate is Stone Cold Jane Austen.  They all find something different in the pages of Austen’s six great novels.

pride_and_prejudice_largeMy own Austen-love goes back to childhood: a voracious reader of classic fiction, I cracked open Pride and Prejudice the summer I was ten.  Although I attended my first JASNA conference as a college freshman, it wasn’t until the early 2000s – some twenty years later – that I discovered the Republic of Pemberley, the largest online Jane Austen community, and realized how differently Jane Austen could be understood by people who all professed to love her.  Her ironic, deceptively simple stories seem to license a wide variety of interpretations; she’s been plausibly described as everything from complacent Tory to rebellious feminist. 

Although every Austen movie release or notable anniversary inspires a spate of articles laying out The Exact Eight Reasons Jane Austen Is Still So Popular, the truth is that Austen appreciation can seem like a literary Rorschach test: we Janeites find in her a reflection of our own preoccupations, a version of our ideal selves. (I see her as a cool, detached observer with a sharp edge. Draw your own conclusions.)  Ultimately, however, I think the kaleidoscope of interpretations does reflect something real about Austen – the richness and depth of her work.  We all find ourselves in her because, in a sense, she contains us all.

Post contributed by Deborah Yaffe, author of Among the Janeites: A Journey Through the World of Jane Austen Fandom (releasing August 6, 2013).    


About the Author:

dyaffe

 

Deborah Yaffe is an award-winning journalist and author, as well as a lifelong Jane Austen fan.  She lives with her family in central New Jersey, USA.

Follow her on Twitter (@DeborahYaffe) and drop by the Among the Janeites Facebook page.

Read more about Deborah Yaffe here.

 . 

 

About the Book:

51nTopVlcmL__SY300_ 

“Visit the world of rabid Jane Austen fans – the people who wear Regency costumes to Jane Austen festivals, spend hours online arguing about Mr. Darcy’s love life, and pore over dozens of modern sequels to Pride and Prejudice. Deborah Yaffe’s Among the Janeites is an entertaining, affectionate non-fiction look at this quirky subculture, by a writer who is both an experienced journalist and a lifelong Janeite.” 

Giveaway: Congratulations to the winners of our giveaway of Among the Janeites: Jackie of jackiemania and Shannon of River City Reading !  And thanks again to Deborah and Houghton Mifflin Harcourt for their participation and generosity!


A Walk with Jane Austen by Lori Smith

Books by Linda Berdoll

Among the Janeites by Deborah Yaffe

The Republic of Pemberley


Me and Jane Austen (#AustenInAugustRBR)

janepictHello, Austenites & Austen Newbies!

I thought I’d kick-off this event by revisiting an old Classics Club question about the appeal (or not) of Jane Austen.  To do this, let’s begin with some delightful thoughts on Austen, from one of my favorite writers, Mark Twain.

In 1895, Twain was sailing across the Indian Ocean. He wrote in his journal that he found Austen “thoroughly artificial” and praised the ship’s library for its lack of Austen novels. He claimed that this “one omission alone would make a fairly good library out of a library that hadn’t a book in it” -Twain, Following the Equator (1897).

His dislike for Austen did not change much over time. He wrote the following in a letter, much later:

“Whenever I take up Pride and Prejudice or Sense and Sensibility, I feel like a barkeeper entering the Kingdom of Heaven. I mean, I feel as he would probably feel, would almost certainly feel. I am quite sure I know what his sensations would be — and his private comments. He would be certain to curl his lip, as those ultra-good Presbyterians went filing self-complacently along. …She makes me detest all her people, without reserve. Is that her intention? It is not believable. Then is it her purpose to make the reader detest her people up to the middle of the book and like them in the rest of the chapters? That could be. That would be high art. It would be worth while, too. Some day I will examine the other end of her books and see.” – from “Jane Austen” in Who Is Mark Twain by Mark Twain (2009).

Was Mark Twain right? Was he being fair when he said that Austen’s books so angered him that “every time [he] read Pride and Prejudice [he wanted] to dig her up and beat her over the skull with her own shin bone?”

Well, it’s certainly fair for anyone to have his or her own opinion. And the great Charles Dickens happened to agree with him, although Dickens’s criticism was more misogynistic in nature (he didn’t think women had the capacity to be genuinely or effectively humorous).

So, who am I to disagree with these giants of American and British literature? Well, I’m a reader with my own equally valid opinions. And I say Jane Austen is a master novelist, perhaps one of the best who ever lived. She’s certainly up there with Emile Zola, D.H. Lawrence, and Thomas Hardy, in my opinion.

Are her books similar in theme? Sure. But they’re also vastly different. Mansfield Park cannot be confused with Sense and Sensibility. Marriage, family, and the middle class – they have a place in every Austen novel, because this is what Austen knew. But it’s also this privileged world and these gossipy people whom Austen dissects and often chastises, in many different ways. Marriage for love or for convenience? Property and station or happiness and companionship? These are questions one can expect to find in Austen.

But there’s much more to her and her works than love and marriage.  Did you know, for instance, that you’ll also hear about human trafficking and the slave trade? What about sexual impropriety in the military, alcoholism, parasitism, and hypochondria? Yep, they’re all in there! These issues and so many more are explored through masterfully constructed narratives, delivered in sometimes biting parody and satire.

Yes, it is safe to say that I love Austen. It took a while, though, and I can understand why, in our contemporary world, we might find her to be a bit dull on the surface. But when you take your time with her, when you look for the subtleties, such as her brilliant control of narrative time and her employment of multiple narrative types to craft a deeper, more complex prose, you might begin to see what all the fuss is about.

northanger-abbey-jane-austen-paperback-cover-artMy first attempt at reading Austen was early in college. I started (and failed to finish) Pride and Prejudice. I reacted in the typically dismissive male-centric way: “This is girly.” Later, in graduate school, I was fortunate enough to study Northanger Abbey and my appreciation for and interest in Austen was piqued. Could I have been wrong??

Shortly after finishing that semester, I revisited Pride and Prejudice on my own. And I finished it. And I thought, “Adam, you dolt!” I had been so utterly, completely, painfully naive and wrong. I re-read P&P again last year, and my appreciation for it grew even deeper. I also hosted Austen in August last year and managed to read Sense and Sensibility, Lady Susan, The Watsons, and Sanditon.  More recently, I was able to finish Mansfield Park. A lot of these works might seem similar in many ways – style, themes, focus. But in reality, they’re quite different and, somehow, never disappointing.

Do I have my favorites? Sure. Could I rank them in some kind of personal “best” to “worst” order? Yes, although that “worst” categorization would be basically meaningless, as there’s no such thing as a “bad” Austen novel. Ultimately, they all have value, they are all entertaining, and they are all complex, but in different ways. Some readers are going to respond better to the funnier, lighter novels, while others will respond to the craftsmanship and depth of the more serious works.

As for me, my favorite is and will probably always be Northanger Abbey. It was Austen’s first book, though the last to be published. It is raw, it is hilarious, and it has its flaws. But it made me double-check myself and my opinions. It made me fall in love with Austen. So, there it will sit, on its lofty pedestal, forever and ever.

Austen in August Master Post (#AustenInAugustRBR)

AustenInAugustRBR-ButtonWelcome to the Master Post for our 2nd Annual Austen In August event! This is a one-month event focused on all things Jane Austen, including her primary texts, any re-imaginings of her works, biographies, critical texts, etc. In late June, I announced sign-ups for the event, and was very surprised by the overwhelming response from all different types of readers & bloggers! I know many of you, like me, have been anxious to get started – so thank you all for your interest, for signing-up, and for spreading the word.

I have a lot of things planned for this month-including giveaways, guest posts, and, of course, my own reading and reviewing of Jane Austen works. First, let’s talk logistics.

At the bottom of this post is a “Mister Linky” widget. Whenever you review a book or write a post related to the event, please link it on this master post. Please include the title or subject of whatever your post is AND your blog name in the “Name” section of the link. It should look something like:

Review of Emma (Roof Beam Reader).”

This will ensure that all the links are in a similar format, and that others will know what your post is about before they click on it. I will make sure that the button on the left-side of my blog will take you to this post. Please make sure to only link-up your posts on this main list!

Whenever you link a post, you will become eligible to win the giveaways that I will be hosting here throughout the month. The only way to be entered for these prizes is to make sure your posts are linked-up here (this includes reviews of the books you’ve read, commentary on Austen topics, giveaways, or any other posts directly related to this event).

There are also going to be quite a few giveaways hosted by participants of the event (thank you for your generosity!). Specific details for each of these giveaways may be different, so be sure to read the rules on those giveaway posts carefully and enter if you are interested! For any of the giveaways, here or at other participants’ blogs, you will need to be pre-registered (by August 3rd) for this event in order to win. 

Be sure to use #AustenInAugustRBR to chat about this event on Twitter & Facebook.

Link-Up Your Posts Below:

Help for Diane Di Prima

jackiemania's avatarjackiemania

BLNhhKqCUAA2IAY.jpg-thumb

 

Back when I wrote my guest post about Women of the Beat Generation for Roof Beam Reader, I talked a little about how Diane Di Prima was not well, and was struggling to take care of her health needs. I noticed an update on the City Lights Bookstore twitter just last week: Diane has been diagnosed with Parkinson’s Disease.

Amber Tamblyn has set up another GiveForward fundraiser for Diane. I was able to give a little, and I hope you will consider giving a little, too.

from her book of poetry, Loba:

“It is still news to her that passion
could steer her wrong
though she went down, a thousand times
strung out
across railroad tracks, off bridges
under cars, or stiff
glass bottle still in hand, hair soft
on greasy pillows, (still it is
news she cannot follow now) & still
come out all right.”

 

View original post

TKAM Read-Along: Part 2 (Ch. 12-21) (#MockingbirdReads)

pp-mockingbird3Hello, Readers!

This is the second check-in post for our read-along of Harper Lee’s To Kill a Mockingbird. In this post, we cover chapters 12-21.

Check-in #1 covered chapters 11-11 and went live on Friday., July 19th.

Check-in #3 (or final review) will cover chapters 22-31 and will go live on Weds., July 31st.

If you want to link-up your own thoughts, your answers to my questions (below), or, eventually, a review of the book, you can do so at This Post

Participation is totally voluntary, of course. Linking-up to your check-in posts and “registering” is just a way for those of us who are reading the book to visit one another, see what we all think, and engage in some fun conversations about this piece of classic American literature.  I’m sure we’ll all have different experiences with this one, and I look forward to reading your thoughts!

Summary of Section Two (Ch. 12-21):

Jem is now twelve years old and Scout is about 8 years old, which means two years have passed since the start of the book.  Jem is feeling much more “grown up” and has stopped spending as much time with Scout, which is difficult for her.  She spends the next summer pining for her friend Dill, but Dill never comes.  In addition, her father is called to the state capital on a regular basis, when the legislature goes into session.  At the beginning of this section, Calpurnia takes the kids to her church (an African-American church on the edge of town).  We learn that it is called “First Purchase” because it was bought with the very first wages of freed slaves. A collection is taken up for the wife of Tom Robinson, who we learned at the end of Part One has been charged with raping a white woman.

Aunt Alexandra, Atticus’s sister, comes to stay with the family for a while, as Atticus will be very busy with the trial and as Alexandra believe the kids need a “woman’s influence” in the house.  Also, there is fear of the difficult time ahead for Jem, Scout, and Atticus, because of Atticus’s decision (which we later learn was not entirely of his own choice) to defend Tom Robinson.  Alexandra tries to teach Jem and Scout about their family history, which is a long one – the Finches have great standing in Maycomb, and she wants to impress upon them the importance of carrying on the respectability of their name.  Alexandra also tries to get rid of Calpurnia (after the church incident, which Alexandra does not agree with), but Atticus refuses.

As Tom Robinson’s trial approaches, he is moved from one jail into Maycomb’s jail.  Atticus realizes there could be trouble from certain people, and decides to spend the night outside of the jailhouse, guarding Robinson.  Sure enough, a small mob does attempt to get at Tom Robinson, but Atticus stands his ground, with help from Jem, Scout, and Dill (who ran away from home to be with Scout and Jem, when he feels neglected by his mother and her new husband).  The kids had shown up unexpectedly, and it is Scout’s innocence and bold friendliness (in addition to her having verbally recognized one of the men and said his name aloud, somewhat shaming him) which causes the men to reconsider and go home.  We also learn that Mr. Underwood, a notorious racist, was also “covering” Atticus the entire time, from his window next door.  Why – we’re not sure. Possibly out of respect for Atticus and for the law.

The trial begins the very next day and the courtroom is packed with men, women, and children, white and black alike (although the white folks get the best seats).  Atticus makes an extraordinarily sound argument for Tom Robinson’s innocence (and for Mr. Ewell’s guilt), while the prosecutor aims to discredit Robinson with the race factor, calling him “boy” and making him look “disrespectful” and dangerous.  The questioning is shocking and disturbing, especially to Dill, who becomes so emotional that he begins to cry, which causes Scout to guide him outside.  There, they meet Mr. Dolphus Raymond, a local drunk who “had relations” with a black woman which resulted in many mixed-race kids.  The kids learn, though, that Mr. Raymond only pretends to be drunk because it is easier for the townsfolk to accept his “eccentricities” if they believe him to be out of his wits.  Indeed, he is sober and kind, and he loves his family.  

At the end of this section, the jury returns with its verdict, which is simultaneously shocking and expected.  Jem, for one, is convinced of a certain outcome, but he was wrong.  He still has much to learn about the world. 

My Thoughts:

I think it is safe to say that I am enjoying and appreciating this book much more than I did the first time around.  I am so glad to be reading this again, and much more closely.  Either I was not in the right place, previously, or I attempted to read it too quickly and without analysis or introspection, which, I believe, this book absolutely requires.

I thought Dill’s absence at the start of this section (which is physically separated from “Part One” of the story) further solidifies the theme of innocence-lost.  Previously, Dill’s arrival each summer heralded games, laughter, mischievousness  and all things childhood.  His absence is felt deeply by Scout, who is not ready to stop being a kid, and much less so by Jem, who is ready to move on.   Another interesting character study is the introduction of the black community, which happens at a necessary and opportune moment (just before Tom Robinson’s trial).  Allowing Scout and Jem to attend Calpurnia’s church and to interact with this close, caring community helps stoke feelings of empathy for Robinson and his family, and causes them (especially Jem) to start thinking about justice in a deeper way.  

Aunt Alexandra is not my favorite character, but I can understand her position and her concerns about the Finch family. I also appreciated the history she brings to the readers (and to Scout & Jem).  Her presence is clearly another opportunity for Scout and Jem to grow-up, and it is paralleled with the reappearance of Dill.  When he comes back, we see that the differences between his approach to life (childish, fantasy-like) and Jem’s (logical, cautionary) are becoming even more apparent.  Scout, too, becomes a caretaker of sorts for Dill, who is one year older than she.  

I have read many criticisms of the scene where Scout “scares off” the mob outside of the jailhouse, but I have to disagree with their assessment that the scene is unbelievable, contrived, or pat.  Going into the scene, I knew what to expect (both because one can sense it coming and also because I remember small parts of it from my previous reading); however, I believe these critics misread this scene as one of “grown men afraid of a little girl.”  That’s just not the case.  They also claim that it’s impossible for Scout to be so unaware of what is really going on here but, again, they’re missing something.  First, a “friendly mob” showed up earlier that day to talk to Atticus at home, to warn him.  Scout had been scared at that time, but Atticus informed her that those were good men.  When she arrived at the jail, it was dark and she could not see the men clearly – she mistook them for the same people, so why wouldn’t she assume they still had good intentions, since Atticus had said as much before?  It is only when she sees a face she recognizes that she understands this is a different group, and midway through her attempt at speaking with the men, she does start to sense that something is wrong.  I found the scene totally believable and heartbreaking.  I think the men’s reaction, too, after having been simultaneously exposed by name and also somewhat shamed by Scout, is understandable (not to mention the fact that they likely did respect Atticus, didn’t expect him to be there, and certainly wouldn’t have pre-planned harming him in front of his own children).  

Finally, I found the trial to be truly gripping, especially in the wake of all that has happened recently with the Trayvon Martin trial here in the U.S.  One man laying out a claim for “humanness” and “truth,” while another played to racial stereotypes and bigoted fears.  It was traumatic in many ways, especially when one considers how long ago this book was written, and how very little progress has been made.  Jem’s full-hearted trust in his father’s ability (which is wonderful to behold, I will admit) and in the goodness and common sense of his neighbors is sweet and respectable, but ultimately misguided.  The end of Chapter 21 is, I believe, a perfect second stopping point for the book (though I didn’t plan it that way!), as it clearly shatters Jem’s perceptions of the world and makes way for his pathway to adulthood.

Questions:

“It’s time you started bein’ a girl and acting right!” (131).

1. Jem has clearly changes some from Part One, when he was telling Scout to stop acting like a girl.  But Scout, Dill, and even Atticus all change in some ways during this second section.  What are your thoughts on these changes?


“I began to feel sweat gathering at the edges of my hair; I could stand anything but a bunch of people looking at me. They were quite still.” (175).

2.  As I mentioned above, there has been much debate about the mob scene outside the jail.  This seems to be a part of the book where many opinions could be found equally valid.  What are your thoughts about what happens between Scout and the men?  Why does it work? Is it believable? Does Scout know what she is doing?  And what do we think about Mr. Underwood’s covert stake-out, having Atticus “covered all the time?” 


“Thomas Jefferson once said that all men are created equal . . . There is a tendency . . . for certain people to use this phrase out of context, to satisfy all conditions. The most ridiculous example I can think of is that the people who run public education promote the stupid and idle along with the industrious – because all men are created equal, educators will gravely tell you, the children left behind suffer terrible feelings of inferiority. We know all men are not created equal . . . some people are smarter than others.” (233).

3.  In the first check-in post, I raised a question about the possible “statements” being made in this book about education.  Some felt the scenes of Scout in school were realism for realism’s sake, others thought Harper Lee might have been trying to say something more.  In light of the above, I’m still convinced that Lee has strong opinions about education – what are your thoughts on this?  Have they changed from last week?  What other conclusions can we draw from Atticus’s assertion that the only way in which we are all equal (in the U.S.) is in the eyes of the law? And is this true?